• insights-banner

    In the Press

The I quotes Miranda Fisher on the family law issues facing non-doms who are considering leaving the UK following the abolition of the non-dom regime announced in the UK Budget

It was announced in the Budget that Rachel Reeves will abolish the ‘non-dom’ tax regime and remove the “outdated concept” of domicile from the tax system from April 2025.

The non-dom scheme applies to UK residents whose permanent home is outside of the country for tax purposes and means they don’t pay UK tax on money they earn elsewhere in the world.

In response to the announcement, many advisors have warned that the abolition of the system could negatively impact the UK, Miranda Fisher, Family Partner, says that it could lead to:

a loss of the highest proportion of millionaires in the world over the next few years

According to a recent report by the Adam Smith Institute, the share of the British population who are millionaires is expected to decline by 20% by 2028 with serious implications for the economy. This is attributed to factors including increased taxation,  tax hikes and the abolition of the non-dom regime under Labour. 

Many non-doms are considering a move in response to the announcements and Miranda shares the family law consequences:

Whilst Italy, Switzerland and Dubai are reportedly among the destinations of choice for those considering a move from the UK, the family law consequences for relocating can be complex, particularly around divorce and child arrangements. 

"If one spouse is considering divorce, the timing of their move could affect where the divorce proceedings can be initiated. Moving abroad could potentially limit the ability to file for divorce in England, which might be strategically important if England is seen as a more favourable jurisdiction. 

"The English courts are known for their discretionary powers in dividing marital assets and for a starting point of equality of division of all assets accumulated during a marriage. Once jurisdiction for divorce in England is lost, the financial settlement on divorce could be subject to the laws of another jurisdiction, which might be significantly less generous to the weaker financial party. 

"Moving from England can raise important issues of living arrangements for children, including choice of school and potential international child abduction. In some cases, where one parent wants to relocate the children abroad and the other parent refuses to agree, we could see applications made to the Family Court for permission to remove the children permanently from England to another country, subject to the children’s best interests. 

Read the full piece in the I here.

Related coverage

City AM Letters (print only), International Adviser

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The abolition of perpetuity periods: Time to sound a note of caution?

    Robert Avis

    Insights

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

Back to top