• insights-banner

    In the Press

City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that media company Sky acted in bad faith when applying for its trademarks, overturning a previous Court of Appeal decision.

The case, which began in 2016, involved Sky suing US tech company SkyKick for trademark infringement. The legal dispute has been significant for intellectual property lawyers due to its potential impact on other businesses.

Charlotte Duly, Head of Brand Protection, comments on the significance of the ruling;

The Supreme Court has allowed SkyKicks’s appeal in part, agreeing with the High Court that the SKY marks were partly applied for in bad faith.

"The fact that SkyKick have been successful in part could mean that holders of broad specifications will need to consider if they have been a little too broad, but the real issue here is defining what that means in practice. This could open a can of worms when it comes to the trade mark registers. The Supreme Court decision means it is possible to infer bad faith where an applicant has included broad goods and services rather than relevant sub-categories. However, it’s worth noting in the present case that Sky had not only applied for broad specifications but were basing infringement proceedings upon goods and services that Sky were unlikely to ever offer. The High Court decision described Sky obtaining broad registrations as a “purely a legal weapon” to use against third parties.

"Whilst today’s decision could lead to a change in how trade marks applications are drafted and possible additional scrutiny of specifications at the examination stage in extreme cases, the UKIPO are unlikely to examine the subjective intentions of an applicant nor investigate bad faith for every broad application filed.

"When determining a trade mark filing strategy there must be consideration of how broad or specific to make trade mark specifications. Broad specifications may still be justified but where such terms are covered, there should be a paper trail documenting the commercial justification for seeking such wide protection. And it remains to be seen if a new wave of challenges or counterclaims relying on the ground of bad faith arise from this decision.

Read the full piece in City AM here.

Related coverage

The Law Society Gazette

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Drapers quotes Kerry Stares on the potential for a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Extra Time: The business of women’s football in Africa

    Sarah Johnson

    Podcasts

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

Back to top