• insights-banner

    In the Press

Spear's quotes Sarah Jane Boon on issues around VAT on private school fees

Labour’s pledge to levy VAT on private school fees could pose particular problems for divorced or separated parents.

When and how school fees are to be paid are often carefully negotiated as part of a financial agreement. If Labour wins the general election on 4 July, fees could rise by 20 per cent, leading to a significant increase in the costs originally agreed.

Sarah Jane Boon, Partner, tells Spear's:

Clients who are subject to school fees orders are worried about how quickly they will be able to get out those, if school fees become unaffordable as a result of VAT being added. On the other side, those clients who have an ex-partner or spouse paying school fees are concerned about the paying party saying the school fees are no longer affordable and a scenario then arising where it is difficult to find a good state school alternative that is the right fit for the child (and which both parents agree on).

They are often particularly anxious if the child may have to move in the middle of a school year and, more so, if that is an important year in terms of exams. Where clients are currently settling matters, and orders are being drawn up, the party who will be paying school fees is often keen for the order to say that their obligation is limited to the pre-VAT position, or to be reconsidered if VAT is added to school fees. The other party is often unwilling to agree to such wording, as they want to try to have certainty about the child’s schooling.

Read the full piece in Spear's here.

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The abolition of perpetuity periods: Time to sound a note of caution?

    Robert Avis

    Insights

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

Back to top