• insights-banner

    In the Press

Sarah Anticoni writes for IFA Magazine on the benefits of mediation for separating couples

For many, the end of a marriage or relationship combines emotional unrest and significant financial uncertainty. The disruption can undermine the best laid financial and tax plans. 

The legal processes to end a marriage and the administrative steps to ascertain a family’s assets before embarking upon planning for a separated family’s future, can be viewed as an unwelcome distress purchase. 

In an article for IFA Magazine, Sarah Anticoni, Partner, explains why mediation is often a sensible path for separating couples, and the benefits that this option can bring.

Sarah explains:

Mediation often appeals to those who wish to have some autonomy over the decision making on their family’s finances. Rather than handing matters over to a judge who will impose an outcome, in mediation, the mediator listens to both parties; gathers the necessary information to identify some solutions; explores those with the parties and reality tests those options. If a proposal is forthcoming, it can be written up in a memorandum of understanding and can be then drawn up into a draft court order to be approved in writing by a judge. No court attendance is therefore necessary.

 

Mediation is by no means a soft option. To achieve financial outcomes, mediation still includes comprehensive financial disclosure of both parties’ assets liabilities, income and outgoings. There is however scope to simplify, or tailor make the disclosure process to enable parties to understand “what” there is before moving into working out “how” it can be fairly divided. 

Read the full article in IFA Magazine here.

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Drapers quotes Kerry Stares on the potential for a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Extra Time: The business of women’s football in Africa

    Sarah Johnson

    Podcasts

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

Back to top