• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Community Infrastructure Levy – a reminder on commencement notices

How to serve a commencement notice

Last year we wrote here about Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) liability notices and associated financial penalties, following a decision by the Planning Inspectorate that a liability notice had been correctly served by the charging authority by sending it to the applicant’s agent via email. 

Last month, the Inspectorate had to consider whether an applicant had correctly served a commencement notice by sending a letter (see here; appeal with reference: APP/K0235/L/24/3347269).

Regulation 67 of the CIL Regulations 2010 (the CIL Regs) details that a commencement notice must be submitted in writing on a form published by the Secretary of State (or on a form to substantially the same effect) prior to commencing development. The Secretary of State has published a template “Form 6” which can be found here, for such a purpose. 

In this case, whilst the Inspector expressed sympathy for the appellant, noting that he had sent a letter to the charging authority informing them of his intention to commence works, it was not in the correct form – therefore it did not comply with the requirements of Regulation 67 and a surcharge was upheld. 

This decision serves as a reminder for applicants to ensure careful compliance with the CIL Regs given that breaches, even if they are genuine mistakes, can lead to financial penalties being imposed. 

When to serve your commencement notice

Regulation 67 states that a commencement notice must be submitted “no later than the day before the day on which the chargeable development is to be commenced”. It is therefore important to establish when development is due to commence.  

Earlier this year we wrote here about the meaning of “commencement” for CIL purposes and the issue has again come before the Planning Inspectorate (see here; appeal with reference: APP/T5150/L/24/3345047).

Regulation 6 of the CIL Regs details that development is to be treated as commencing on the earliest date when a material operation begins, with “material operation” having the same meaning as section 56 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (the TCPA).

In this appeal, the charging authority considered that demolition of internal walls amounted to commencement. However, the Inspector determined that the works undertaken were minor such that they did not amount to a “material operation”.  The effect was that a commencement notice did not have to be served and CIL had not been triggered.  

Those undertaking preliminary works should consider the risk that the Council will argue that the permission has been implemented and CIL has become payable. 

"Where planning permission is granted for a chargeable development, a commencement notice must be submitted to the collecting authority no later than the day before the day on which the chargeable development is to be commenced" (Regulation 67(1))

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Unlocking Capital: The Strategic Art of Selling Loans

    James Walton

    Insights

  • Building, Property Wire and Building Design quote Michael O'Connor on the government's latest Grenfell inquiry report

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Passage of the English Arbitration Act 2025 into Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • A Ray of Light for Developers - High Court provides some comfort in recent injunction case

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • 5 trends to watch in International Arbitration in 2025

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on Labour's approach to logistics and infrastructure

    Eddie Richards

    In the Press

  • A Labour of Love: The impact on the future of social care under the Labour budget

    Joanne Searle

    Quick Reads

  • Moths, a mansion house and multi-million pound misrepresentations

    Katy Ackroyd

    Insights

  • Building Design quotes Kevin Gibbs on Heathrow's plans for a third runway by end of next parliament

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Challenges for commercial property in 2025

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Property Week quotes Georgina Muskett on a judgment relating to a moth-infested Notting Hill mansion purchased for £32.5m

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • Rivals: Filming Locations and Considerations for Landed Estates

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024: provisions removing two-year qualifying criteria for certain lease extensions and freehold purchases in force

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

Back to top