• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Tax treatment on pensions following the Budget and the impact on divorce settlements

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, yesterday announced Labour’s first post-election budget. It brings a variety of tax changes, including in relation to the tax treatment of pensions.  

The key change from the Budget, in relation to the tax treatment of pensions, is that “from 6 April 2027 most unused pension funds and death benefits will be included within the value of a person’s estate for Inheritance Tax purposes”. A technical consultation has been launched to consider the process required to implement this change for UK-registered pension schemes. 

It is important to remember that the majority of domestic state pensions i.e. UK-registered pension schemes (excluding the basic state pension and new state pension) are capable of being shared between ex-spouses upon divorce. This includes pensions that are in payment. 

There are three ways in which pensions can be divided between ex-spouses when they divorce in England and Wales:

1.They can be offset – so that one party receives non-pension assets in exchange for giving up any rights they may have to the pension assets. This is not without risks, and a Pensions on Divorce Expert (sometimes referred to as a “PODE”) can be instructed to provide an expert view on what an appropriate offsetting amount could be. 

2.They can be shared (known as a Pension Sharing Order) - a transfer from one party’s pension pot (or pots) to the other party. The other party will then hold the pension provision that has been transferred to them in their own pension pot and, depending on the rules of the pension being shared, this can be an existing pension or a new pension set up for that purpose. 

Pension Sharing Orders are the most common way to split a pension on divorce. 

It is important to know that Pension Sharing Orders are always expressed as a percentage, rather than a defined sum, and can be implemented by the pension trustees at any point within a four month window following receipt of (1) the sealed final financial remedy order; (2) the sealed pension sharing annex; (3) the final order of divorce of dissolution; and (4) payment of all outstanding charges requested by the pension scheme. If someone is continuing to pay into a pension that is to be shared then they may wish to cease making payments, provided there is no agreement that they will continue to do so, until the pension sharing order has been implemented.

3.They can be attached to (known as a Pension Attachment Order) – the court can order that one party receives the following provision from the other’s pension pot (or pots):

a. All or a proportion of the income when the pension comes into payment;

b. All or a proportion of the available lump sum when the pension comes into payment; and

c. All or a proportion of the lump sum payable in the event of the death of the party who holds the pension.

The benefit to the receiving party of this provision will need to be considered in light of the new tax changes and potential Inheritance Tax charges on any remaining pension funds in the event of the death of the paying party.

Pension sharing can often form a core part of an ex-spouse’s financial settlement on divorce, and should not be overlooked. Family lawyers will need to take careful note of the Inheritance Tax changes for pensions announced in the Budget when advising on pension sharing on divorce going forward.

 

"from 6 April 2027 most unused pension funds and death benefits will be included within the value of a person’s estate for Inheritance Tax purposes"

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Relocating to Switzerland: trusts

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Insights

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Drapers quotes Kerry Stares on the potential for a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Extra Time: The business of women’s football in Africa

    Sarah Johnson

    Podcasts

Back to top