• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Guidance on registered BNG sites

In a joint letter published on 21 July 2024, the Secretary of State for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Steve Reed MP) and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Angela Rayner MP), expressed the importance of sustainability and environmental conservation alongside house building. 

At present, biodiversity net gain (BNG) continues to be a key component of the planning and development process, although there have been questions as to whether it would be better replaced by some form of levy. 

It is now over 7 months since the 10% BNG mandatory requirement for major development came into effect and the body of guidance around BNG is ever evolving. For example, on 21 August 2024, updates to the “Biodiversity net gain: exempt developments” guidance were published, clarifying the criteria a development must meet to qualify for exemption as a self-build or custom build. 

More recently, on 5 September 2024, Natural England published guidance on making amends to and removals of registrations of biodiversity gain sites and amending allocation of off-site biodiversity gains to a development. The guidance confirms there are limited circumstances in which amends may be made to the BNG register. For instance, any change to the register may only be made by the freeholder or leaseholder (or any person who has obtained their written consent). In respect of amending entries on the BNG register the following reasons may permit an application:

  1. Changes to section 106 agreements or conservation covenants which secure the land for BNG purposes for a period of at least 30 years; or 
  2. The site information on the BNG register is incomplete, or inaccurate, for any other reason. 

Furthermore, there are limited circumstances where an application can be made to amend allocations of Offsite Gains i.e. where a developer cannot meet their full BNG requirement on site. The application to amend must be either seek to reduce the size, area or length of an allocated habitat or remove a recorded allocation entirely. Guidance confirms that an application cannot be made to amend an allocation that relates to an extant planning permission. Clear evidence must be provided that the planning permission conditions related to this allocation are no longer in place (e.g. where a permission has lapsed or been revoked) such as a letter from the LPA (although the guidance does not provide examples of what this would look like).

Natural England’s guidance also touches on applications to remove a site from the BNG register. Again, there are limited conditions where these may be made, firstly, the site must not have any partial or full allocations against it. The application must relate to only one gain site, and it must be for the removal of the gain site in its entirety - partial removal of a site is not permitted. 

To conclude, BNG presents an opportunity for landowners and promoters to utilise their land for ecological enhancement as well as creating potential revenue streams. However, the recent government guidance demonstrates that there are limited circumstances where a registration or allocation on the biodiversity gain sites register can be amended.  

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Golden Brick Reform – a gap in the budget?

    Anna Donnelly

    Quick Reads

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

  • Building Safety for Higher Risk Buildings – How is the Regulatory Regime bedding in?

    Kate Knox

    Insights

  • Navigating the Digital Services Act and Online Safety Act: A Quick Guide for Digital Platform Providers on the need to police content

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Quick Reads

  • Retail Collection – Episode 1: URBN

    Ilona Bateson

    Podcasts

Back to top