• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Charles Russell Speechlys hosts its second International Arbitration Conference in London

On 12 September 2024 Charles Russell Speechlys hosted its second International Arbitration Conference. 

Senior dispute practitioners from Charles Russell Speechlys shared their insights on developments in international arbitration in London, Paris, Dubai, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The event took place at the Ivy, Tower Bridge. 

Following opening remarks by Thomas R. Snider, Partner and Head of International Arbitration at Charles Russell Speechlys, the panel discussed recent updates in leading arbitral seats.

  • Steven Carey, partner in London, began with an overview of developments in England and Wales in the last year.  The most notable update is the Arbitration Bill which was featured in the King’s Speech and which proposes amendments to the Arbitration Act 1996. The bill is intended to facilitate more efficient dispute resolution, draw in more global business, and cement London as a preferred arbitral seat. 
  • Simon Le Wita, partner in Paris, highlighted debate surrounding Article 25 of the Act of 13 June 2024, which some scholars think will revolutionise the French arbitration regime.  This Act is intended to further the French legal system’s goal of continuing and extending its arbitration-friendly approach. It also intends to ensure that French arbitration proceedings continue to have the highest degree of autonomy in the world. 
  • Gareth Mills, partner in London, discussed the ongoing impact of Dubai’s Decree No. 34. Decree 34 of 2021 which effectively abolished the Dubai International Financial Centre-London Court of International Arbitration Centre (“DIFC-LCIA”) and the Emirates Maritime Arbitration Centre (“EMAC”) and transferred its operations to the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). Gareth highlighted that parties have subsequently argued in the courts of numerous jurisdictions (including Singapore, Abu Dhabi and the United States), with various levels of success, that because of this change they did not consent to arbitrate before the DIAC (because the court they originally agreed to arbitrate in no longer exists). Gareth recommended that parties with existing arbitration agreements governed by the DIFC-LCIA or EMAC agree on where they will arbitrate if a dispute arises to ensure certainty vis a vis the application of such clauses.  Gareth also referred to recent developments in the arbitration landscapes of Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia where new rules and supporting legislation were transforming the arbitration landscape of the GCC region.  
  • Peter Brabant, partner in Singapore, highlighted that following a shift to conscious investment and new technologies, arbitrations dealing with oil and gas and renewables disputes have and will continue to increase. Recent amendments to the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC”) rules which intend to increase the efficiency and reduce the cost of SIAC arbitrations were also mentioned. Additionally, Peter mentioned that it is easy to consolidate proceedings in the SIAC, making it an efficient centre to arbitrate in if there are a number of disputes within the same deal or transaction. 
  • Stephen Chan, partner in Hong Kong, explained how freezing orders made under the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (“HKIAC”) rules can be directly enforced in mainland China. Stephen pointed out that this power is exclusive to the HKIAC, and as there are relatively few requirements to the enforcement of such injunctions most applications are successful. 

In the Q&A that followed, an audience member asked whether international arbitration is truly ‘international’. The panel recognised the complexity of this topic, but pointed out that despite geopolitical challenges, the global reach of international arbitration continues to grow.

 

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Women in Chancery: Speak with Effect and Influence Webinar

    Events

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Document Production in French Set-aside Proceedings: limited powers despite an increasingly extensive scrutiny of the set aside judge

    Simon Le Wita

    Insights

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Navigating the Legal Landscape of Non-Performing Loan Acquisitions in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

  • Building Safety for Higher Risk Buildings – How is the Regulatory Regime bedding in?

    Kate Knox

    Insights

Back to top