• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Are Yorkshire pudding toppings a reason for divorce? Fortunately not anymore: no fault divorce – over 2 years on

It has now been over two years since the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 came into force on 6 April 2022. This brought with it the introduction of “no fault divorce” and not a day too soon for most, if not all, divorce lawyers. It now seems a distant memory having to advise clients that if they wished to divorce they would need either to blame their spouse for committing adultery or behaving unreasonably. The alternative being to wait until 2 years after separation if the other party consented to the divorce, or five years if they did not.

Would eating your Yorkshire pudding for dessert, with sweet sauce or, the ultimate food faux pas in this author's opinion, with cream and jam(?!), have counted as unreasonable behaviour to demonstrate the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage? Perhaps not. But that's not to say someone would not have found such behaviour unreasonable, as clearly one wife did as she took to Reddit to comment, although perhaps with a wry sense of humour: “Just spent three hours making Sunday dinner and for desert [sic] my husband has put jam on a Yorkshire pudding! Divorce?”

The no fault divorce reform has taken further unnecessary contention out of applying for divorce. Both parties may now also apply jointly and the number of joint applications is on the rise.

The no fault divorce process is now as follows:

  1. One or both parties to the marriage file for divorce online, confirming that the marriage has irretrievably broken down. No reason as to why needs to be given.
  2. If the application is made jointly, then both parties will be served with the issued divorce application and receive an acknowledgement of service to complete and return. If a sole application is made, the respondent party will be served with the issued divorce application and an acknowledgement of service to complete and return. 
  3. Once the divorce application has been issued by the court, there is a 20 week “cooling off” period. After this 20 week period, the parties (if a joint application) or the sole applicant (if a sole application), can apply for the first order of divorce, known as the Conditional Order.
  4. The court will consider the application for a Conditional Order and confirm to the parties that they are entitled to a Conditional Order and provide the date and time and court where the Conditional Order will be pronounced. The parties need not attend. 
  5. 6 weeks and 1 day after the Conditional Order has been pronounced the joint applicants, or the sole applicant, can apply for the Final Order of divorce. This is the order that legally ends the marriage. 

The process is much simpler than determining if how one eats one’s Yorkshire pudding could count as unreasonable behaviour. Indeed it appears that the correct way to eat a Yorkshire pudding is a divisive and controversial issue. Although, it is of course with gravy as part of a Sunday roast, maybe some mustard on the side, and not as dessert!

 

"Not only does the man put a sweet sauce on his Yorkshire pudding, he enjoys them as a dessert. Taking to Reddit his baffled wife said: "Just spent three hours making Sunday dinner and for desert [sic] my husband has put jam on a Yorkshire pudding! Divorce?""

Our thinking

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The abolition of perpetuity periods: Time to sound a note of caution?

    Robert Avis

    Insights

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The Halloween Budget – will wealth creators be spooked?

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Budget puts the squeeze on additional property purchases

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Transatlantic shockwaves herald sea change in UK tax treatment of US-connected individuals

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

  • Budget 2024 - IHT winners and losers

    Julia Cox

    Quick Reads

  • Succession and tax strategy for farmers and business owners post-Budget

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Sophie Dworetzsky writes for Tax Journal on the proposed new foreign income and gains (FIG) regime announced in the UK budget

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • The Financial Times and Bloomberg quote Dominic Lawrance on the implications of the changes to the non-dom regime announced in the UK Budget

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • Consequences of the abolition of the non-dom regime and 30 October 2024 Budget: what are the family law issues for wealthy clients leaving the UK?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn budget - Capital Gains Tax increase and divorce settlements

    Sarah Higgins

    Quick Reads

Back to top