• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

There is a new tax law in town – but it is probably not what you think

On 7 March 2024 the government of Dubai issued Law No. (1) of 2024 on taxation of foreign banks operating in Dubai (New Tax Law). The New Tax Law imposes a 20% tax on the annual taxable income of foreign banks operating in Dubai, with the exception of foreign banks licensed in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). 

The news of a 20% tax on foreign banks caused a stir with discussions about market shifts from onshore to the DIFC, competitive advantages for local banks, increased consumer charges and other speculations about potential impacts on Dubai’s banking sector and possible ripple effects across related industries. 

The reality however is that while the law is new, the tax charge is not. The New Tax Law repeals Regulation No. 2 of 1996 which already introduced a 20% tax on foreign banks licensed in Dubai in 1996. Following the UAE's introduction of a corporate tax regime in 2022, foreign banks in Dubai now faced the prospect of an even higher tax bill with an additional 9% in corporate income tax on top of the 20% that they were already paying on annual income. The New Tax Law addresses this double tax burden by allowing foreign banks to deduct their corporate tax from the 20% tax charge.

Consequently, the New Tax Law is a positive development for foreign banks in Dubai and is unlikely to cause any significant market shifts or increase consumer burden.

In short, the New Tax Law does not increase the tax burden on foreign banks in Dubai, in fact it does the opposite by ending double taxation for foreign banks in Dubai by allowing them to absorb their corporate tax payments into the annual 20 percent banking tax charge.

Dubai: Sheikh Mohammed announces new 20% annual tax on foreign banks

Our thinking

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Swiss Anti-Corruption Laws: A Guide to Bribery Offences, Compliance, and Penalties

    Daniela Iselin

    Insights

  • Passage of the English Arbitration Act 2025 into Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • 5 trends to watch in International Arbitration in 2025

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • SFC’s new regulatory roadmap for Hong Kong’s VA market – A-S-P-I-Re

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • ESMA Consultation on Guidelines for the criteria to assess knowledge and competence under MiCA

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • Justice for the Victims of Britain's Largest Ponzi Scheme?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • The FCA’s requirements for Payments Firms

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • Mahmood v Standard Chartered Bank – A landmark decision in discrimination and victimisation but what does it mean for discrimination claims in the DIFC?

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

  • Digital Securities Sandbox Update

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

  • The Times and City AM quote Charlotte Hill on the FCA's plans to delete year-old emails

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes a new Funds Partner in Hong Kong

    David Collins

    News

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

  • A Digital Pound: The Bank of England January 2025 Update

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

  • Insights from FRC’s review of Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“CFD”) by AIM and large private companies

    Megan Gray

    Quick Reads

  • MiCA: The Fundamentals

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

  • Racheal Muldoon and Hasan Almosoy write for Finextra on the day of the DORA deadline

    Racheal Muldoon

    In the Press

Back to top