• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Potential parental disputes about school fees should a Labour government add VAT to fees

Parents of children at independent schools will be used to regularly assessing the affordability of school fees against their finances – school fees have increased ahead of inflation for the past 25 years. However, with the next general election approaching, and Labour’s pledge to add VAT to private school fees within their first year of government, families could be hit with significantly increased fees as soon as the next academic year. This change could make private schooling unaffordable for some families and bring about concerns about how easily (and when) a good state alternative could be found. 

This possibility may be especially worrying for separated or divorced parents, who are committed to a court-imposed obligation to discharge school fees until their children reach the end of their secondary education. If Labour do form the next government, there may be increasing numbers of parents who seek to vary their court obligations on the grounds of affordability. 

Separated couples often struggle with funding two households on divorce. The higher earning party may struggle to continue paying school fees if, for example, they are also obliged to pay spousal and child maintenance (as well as solely fund a mortgage on their home). Issues of affordability can also arise years after separation, as children grow older, and one parent wants to send their child to a more expensive school than the other is willing to agree. The decision as to where children are educated falls to both parents to be agreed under their parental responsibility, so disagreements over such issues can lead to litigation – with the court making the ultimate decision. 

However, even in those cases where the court has already made a decision, the addition of VAT onto school fees, especially if schools choose to pass the entire 20% rise in costs onto parents, could arguably be a change of circumstances leading to a parent seeing to vary the court’s previous decision. If, for example, a parent was paying annual school fees of £31,000 (the average cost to send a child to boarding school in 2023), and had three children, they would already be paying £93,000 per annum. A 20% increase on those fees, would push the annual figure closer to £112,000, requiring them to be earning circa £200,000 gross per annum just to cover the cost of the school fees. 

However, there are always risks of returning a matter to court, and a parent seeking to absolve themselves of a school fees liability could find themselves facing a cross-application for increased spousal maintenance (with the other party arguing that their ex-spouse could afford to pay them more maintenance if they were no longer paying school fees).

There may also be issues over timing. Family courts are already overwhelmed with current cases, and an application about the cost of private schooling could take a year to resolve through a court-based process. Meanwhile, some options for the child’s schooling may be “off the table” if applications cannot be made or accepted in time because parents are waiting for the issue to be resolved in court. Over a time-sensitive matter like their child’s education, families might be better served by considering mediation and arbitration, for quicker and arguably less expensive outcomes. 

Our thinking

  • Bloomberg quotes Piers Master on the increase in inquiries ahead of the UK non-dom tax changes

    Piers Master

    In the Press

  • The Times quotes Henry Fea on the potential options available to farmers to help minimise inheritance tax bills

    Henry Fea

    In the Press

  • The UK’s Autumn 2024 Budget: good news for British ex-pats

    Lisa-Jane Dupernex

    Insights

  • The April 2026 changes to Agricultural and Business Property Relief

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Charles Russell Speechlys Family Team Debate – Reform of the Law on Financial Claims on Separation and Divorce

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Clarifying the complexities of APR and IHT for family farms: a prime time fact-check analysis

    Henry Fea

    Quick Reads

  • The future of IHT planning with pensions

    Harriet Betteridge

    Quick Reads

  • Investing in Africa’s digital economy – the brink of a digital revolution

    Nnamdi Nwokedi

    Quick Reads

  • Ensure you can return to the UK in 2025 – navigating the eVisa rollout

    Rose Carey

    Insights

  • Citywealth quotes Sally Ashford on the challenges faced by ageing parents with adult children who have mental or physical health issues

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • English Rugby En Francais: Does farewell to England mean au revoir to English Law?

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • FT Weekend's House & Home Ski Living Special quotes Grégoire Uldry on the appeal of relocating to the Swiss Alps

    Grégoire Uldry

    In the Press

  • "AI Battlefields" Conference - Some Highlights

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

Back to top