• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Planning essentials case update: Does an enforcement notice subsist against a site?

A recent High Court judgment serves as a useful reminder that a planning enforcement notice will subsist against a site unless it is formally withdrawn.

The case of Pathfield Estates Limited v London Borough of Haringey [2023] EWHC 1790 (Admin) considered an enforcement notice which was served in 2008 relating to the unauthorised conversion of a property from two to five flats, with a requirement to restore the property to 2 flats. More than a decade later, after a new breach, criminal proceedings were taken.  

After service of the 2008 enforcement notice, the local planning authority had agreed that the notice would be treated as complied with if Pathfield Estates Limited converted the property into a single dwelling-house, and the authority sent out “closure letters” confirming the same.

A few years later, the council became aware that the property was being used, not as a single dwelling house, but rather as 6 flats. Following an unsuccessful application for a certificate of lawfulness aiming to authorise the lawfulness of the use as 6 flats, the council instigated criminal proceedings. In 2021 Pathfield was convicted for breach of an enforcement notice.

Pathfield appealed to the High Court, arguing that by virtue of the confirmation that the enforcement notice had been complied with in 2008, the council had implicitly waived or varied the requirement to reinstate the property. The High Court disagreed – finding that the council had only indicated that it would not enforce against a single dwelling, not that the enforcement notice no longer prohibited use as more than 2 flats.

The case is an important reminder of how an enforcement notice can still bite after many years.

Of some assistance to developers is the fact that the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA) gives authorities flexibility in terms of management of enforcement notices. For example, authorities can:

  • serve a letter on a person assuring them that they will not face prosecution for breach of an enforcement notice (but they may subsequently withdraw such an assurance) (section 172A TCPA);
  • waive or relax a requirement of an enforcement notice (section 173A(1)(b); or
  • completely withdraw an enforcement notice (section 173A(1)(a) TCPA).

However, the TCPA explicitly states that compliance alone does not discharge an enforcement notice (section 181). Therefore, landowners should be reminded that:

  • Assurances by a local planning authority that certain acts will be sufficient to comply with an enforcement notice will not preclude an authority from relying on the notice in the future.
  • Any relaxation, waiving or withdrawal of an enforcement notice should be evidenced by formal notice.
  • An enforcement notice will subsist unless it is formally withdrawn. Therefore, unless it is withdrawn, the risk of enforcement for any breach will persist.

Compliance does not discharge an enforcement notice.

Our thinking

  • Modernising Business Tenancies: Should the redevelopment ground be altered?

    Andrew Ross

    Insights

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Georgina Muskett on the future implications of a high-profile court judgment relating to a £32.5m moth-infested mansion

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Claire Fallows on the government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • PBC Today quotes Mark White on Manchester United's plans to build a new football stadium worth £2 billion

    Mark White

    In the Press

  • Is grey belt the key to unlocking growth in the logistics sector?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • The Path to Commonhold is Set in Stone by the Government: What do landlords and developers need to know about the Government’s White Paper on Commonhold?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • Planning essentials case update: do I need planning permission to work from home?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Passage of the English Arbitration Act 2025 into Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • A Ray of Light for Developers - High Court provides some comfort in recent injunction case

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • Joanne Searle and Ciara McEwen write for The Carer on what the Labour government is doing for the future of social care

    Joanne Searle

    In the Press

  • Is nuclear power the way forward for data centres?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • 5 trends to watch in International Arbitration in 2025

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on Labour's approach to logistics and infrastructure

    Eddie Richards

    In the Press

  • A Labour of Love: The impact on the future of social care under the Labour budget

    Joanne Searle

    Quick Reads

  • Moths, a mansion house and multi-million pound misrepresentations

    Katy Ackroyd

    Insights

  • Building Design quotes Kevin Gibbs on Heathrow's plans for a third runway by end of next parliament

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

Back to top