• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

A Pret a Manger employee was trapped in a walk-in freezer for two and a half hours on 29 July 2021. She was found in a state of distress, experiencing difficulty breathing and having lost sensation in her legs and feet. She was subsequently treated for hypothermia.

An investigation by Westminster City Council found that a suitable risk assessment had not been carried out. Pret a Manger was prosecuted, and last month, the company was fined £800,000 and ordered to pay an additional £23,667 in costs.

The fine, and the publicity it has attracted, stands as a salient reminder that all businesses must maintain a dynamic approach to health and safety in the workplace, including the continuous review of policies, procedures and facilities. Crucially, business must act promptly and proactively when they receive warnings or become aware of issues which may pose a potential health and safety risk. 

Under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, employers have a duty to minimise risks to health in the workplace so far as reasonably practicable. The particular risks relating to In temperature-controlled environments have been highlighted by the Health and Safety Executive which identifies the importance of being able to open doors to walk-in freezers from the inside and recommends installing trapped person alarms where appropriate. Further guidance in the British Standard BS 7915:1998 ‘Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Guide to design and evaluation of working practices for cold indoor working environments’ also underlines the necessity of conducting a risk assessment to identify appropriate precautions, such as personal protective equipment at lower temperatures.

This particular incident was preceded by several callouts in the 19 months beforehand due to ineffective internal push buttons, including a previous occasion at this same location in January 2020, where an employee was locked in a freezer after the internal door release mechanism malfunctioned.

Pret entered a guilty plea to an offence contrary to the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The District Judge initially considered a fine of £1.6m, taking into account the failure to act on previous warnings.  However, the fine was subsequently reduced after consideration of Pret a Manger’s early plea and its mitigation.  This included the full review which Pret a Manger had carried out following the incident. It had also worked with the manufacturer of the fridge to prevent recurrence, including revisiting all existing systems and, where appropriate, enhancing these processes.

Our thinking

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New "In-House Counsel Privilege" in Swiss law

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

  • Swiss Anti-Corruption Laws: A Guide to Bribery Offences, Compliance, and Penalties

    Daniela Iselin

    Insights

  • Passage of the English Arbitration Act 2025 into Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Mary Bagnall writes for FMCG CEO on the recent Thatchers v Aldi court ruling

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • A Ray of Light for Developers - High Court provides some comfort in recent injunction case

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • RTHK interviews Patrick Chan on the rise of sports arbitration in Hong Kong

    Patrick Chan

    In the Press

  • Bank of Mum and Dad PLC

    George Harrison

    Quick Reads

  • Stephen Burns and Katie Bewick write for Growth Business on the options available for appointing a new director after a company dispute

    Stephen Burns

    In the Press

  • 5 trends to watch in International Arbitration in 2025

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Living Together in the 2020s: Why more Gen Z’s are Saying 'Yes' to Cohabitation Agreements

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Stepping into the Director's Chair: The Landscape of Risk in Distressed Companies – Misfeasance Trading

    Jessica Boxford

    Insights

  • ESMA Consultation on Guidelines for the criteria to assess knowledge and competence under MiCA

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • Justice for the Victims of Britain's Largest Ponzi Scheme?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

Back to top