• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Prenuptial Agreements for the Older Couple: what is the right family law advice for Rupert Murdoch and those finding new love later in life?

As Rupert Murdoch, 91, is photographed with new girlfriend, Ann-Lesley Smith, 66, some people will be thinking “isn’t everyone, including Rupert Murdoch, entitled to a bit of happiness in their 90s?” Others/anyone who has watched HBO’s Succession will be thinking “whatever are Lachlan and the rest of the Murdoch children going to make of all this?” 

The impact of a second marriage (and potential divorce) on children from an earlier relationship is just one of the reasons that prenuptial agreements are so important for older couples. For such children, there is an obvious tension between wanting a parent to be happy, and worrying about depletion of an inheritance in favour of the incoming spouse. A prenuptial agreement, providing (potentially modest) needs-based financial provision for the new spouse in the event of divorce or even death, rather than a share of the family fortune, can allay fears and avoid damage to new family relationships. 

Any family lawyer will tell you that prenuptial agreements come into their own for the older couple and in cases of inherited/family wealth. It is significantly easier to negotiate a prenuptial agreement for an older couple, where the fortune has already been amassed and there is no prospect of further children of the marriage.

Back in 2007, Susan Sangster, aged 50, described by her fourth husband, 62 year old multi-millionaire property developer Stuart Crossley, as a ”career divorcee”, became one of the first to test the strength of a prenuptial agreement for an older, childless couple. Prior to the marriage, just 2 years earlier, Sangster and Crossley had signed a prenuptial agreement which said neither would make a claim against the other in the event of divorce. The Court of Appeal described the prenuptial agreement as “a factor of magnetic importance” in deciding to short circuit the standard family law disclosure process, and permitting Crossley to argue Sangster should simply be held to the Agreement. 

Fast forward to 2023, and with the benefit of the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Radmacher v Granatino and subsequent case law, a prenuptial agreement will be upheld by the English Court provided (a) both parties understood the implications of the agreement when they entered into it and (b) it is reasonably fair.  Independent specialist legal advice on both sides and accurate financial disclosure are essential components, as is the need for the agreement to be signed without undue pressure on either party and, ideally, not in close proximity to the wedding day. 

When asked about his succession plans, Rupert Murdoch once famously responded “live forever”. Absent immortality, a well prepared pre or post nuptial agreement, as part of succession planning, is advisable for those entering into marriage later in life. 

As Dominic Ponsford, the editor of the Press Gazette, put it: “It certainly does not harm Rupert, at the age of 91, to be exuding an image of vitality and virility when what happens next with News Corp and Fox remains the talk of Fleet Street.”

Our thinking

  • The Times quotes Henry Fea on the potential options available to farmers to help minimise inheritance tax bills

    Henry Fea

    In the Press

  • The UK’s Autumn 2024 Budget: good news for British ex-pats

    Lisa-Jane Dupernex

    Insights

  • The April 2026 changes to Agricultural and Business Property Relief

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Charles Russell Speechlys Family Team Debate – Reform of the Law on Financial Claims on Separation and Divorce

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Clarifying the complexities of APR and IHT for family farms: a prime time fact-check analysis

    Henry Fea

    Quick Reads

  • The future of IHT planning with pensions

    Harriet Betteridge

    Quick Reads

  • Investing in Africa’s digital economy – the brink of a digital revolution

    Nnamdi Nwokedi

    Quick Reads

  • Ensure you can return to the UK in 2025 – navigating the eVisa rollout

    Rose Carey

    Insights

  • Citywealth quotes Sally Ashford on the challenges faced by ageing parents with adult children who have mental or physical health issues

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • English Rugby En Francais: Does farewell to England mean au revoir to English Law?

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • FT Weekend's House & Home Ski Living Special quotes Grégoire Uldry on the appeal of relocating to the Swiss Alps

    Grégoire Uldry

    In the Press

  • "AI Battlefields" Conference - Some Highlights

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The abolition of perpetuity periods: Time to sound a note of caution?

    Robert Avis

    Insights

Back to top