• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

UAE Ministry of Justice Supports Reciprocal Enforcement of English Judgments

On 13 September 2022 the UAE Ministry of Justice issued a letter informing the Dubai Courts that the English Courts had recognised a UAE judgment, and as such the requirement for reciprocity when considering whether or not to enforce an English judgment had been met. This is a significant development which is expected to make enforcement of English judgments more straightforward in the UAE, although it remains the case that enforcement is not automatic.

Previously, when seeking to enforce an English judgment a judgment creditor had, to satisfy the UAE Courts, amongst other things, that the English Courts would enforce a UAE judgment, which led to a high risk of inconsistency case to case. Whilst not strictly binding on the UAE Courts, the Ministry of Justice’s letter seems to have resolved this issue, at least in part, as it notes that the UAE Courts should recognise that reciprocity does now exist between the two jurisdictions' courts, when it comes to enforcing each other’s judgments. 

The English judgment referred to in the Ministry of Justice's letter is Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC v Puri [2021] EWCA Civ 770, which concerned the enforcement of a UAE judgment (arising out of a claim related to a dishonoured cheque) in England. The English Court of Appeal found that the Dubai Court of Cassation judgment was to be recognised and enforced in England because the UAE Court had jurisdiction over the dispute, the judgment was final, and it did not offend English public policy. 

Whilst it is anticipated that the Ministry of Justice’s confirmation of reciprocity will streamline the process of enforcement of English judgments in the UAE overall, other criteria for recognition and enforcement still need to be satisfied under the general rules for enforcement of foreign judgments. These criteria are contained in the UAE Civil Procedures Law (Federal Law No.11/1992) and Cabinet Decision No. 57/2018, and are that:

  1. The UAE Courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute.
  2. The foreign court had jurisdiction in accordance with its own rules and properly issued judgment under those rules. 
  3. The defendant was summoned and represented before the foreign court.
  4. The judgment is final (i.e. it has res judicata effect). 
  5. The judgment does not conflict with a UAE judgment or order, nor is it contrary to UAE public morals. 

The Ministry of Justice’s letter is nonetheless a welcome development. It is anticipated that it will give greater confidence to those seeking to enforce English judgments in the UAE, and demonstrates the commitment of the UAE Courts to maintaining a good judicial relationship with the English Courts, to the mutual benefit of both countries.

If you have any questions please contact Sara Sheffield (Partner) sara.sheffield@crsblaw.com. 

The International Cooperation Department of the Ministry of Justice requests courts in the country to take all the legal steps required to acknowledge and enforce orders by English courts.

Our thinking

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New "In-House Counsel Privilege" in Swiss law

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

  • Swiss Anti-Corruption Laws: A Guide to Bribery Offences, Compliance, and Penalties

    Daniela Iselin

    Insights

  • Passage of the English Arbitration Act 2025 into Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Mary Bagnall writes for FMCG CEO on the recent Thatchers v Aldi court ruling

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • RTHK interviews Patrick Chan on the rise of sports arbitration in Hong Kong

    Patrick Chan

    In the Press

  • Stephen Burns and Katie Bewick write for Growth Business on the options available for appointing a new director after a company dispute

    Stephen Burns

    In the Press

  • 5 trends to watch in International Arbitration in 2025

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Living Together in the 2020s: Why more Gen Z’s are Saying 'Yes' to Cohabitation Agreements

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Stepping into the Director's Chair: The Landscape of Risk in Distressed Companies – Misfeasance Trading

    Jessica Boxford

    Insights

  • Justice for the Victims of Britain's Largest Ponzi Scheme?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Moths, a mansion house and multi-million pound misrepresentations

    Katy Ackroyd

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Tamasin Perkins on the concerns surrounding the proposed amendment to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Challenges for commercial property in 2025

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

Back to top