• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

SDLT Warning!

HMRC have recently issued a press release warning tax payers of the risks of making speculative Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) refund claims. New homeowners often receive cold calls from tax agents who operate on a no win, no fee basis.  However, many are unaware that HMRC can sometimes (and indeed often do) raise enquiries into refunds after payment – by which point the agent will have received their fee and the taxpayer may be left to pay any further sums due. If a refund has been issued incorrectly it must be repaid with interest and in some cases penalties may also be charged.

SDLT is a tax on land transactions that applies in England and Northern Ireland. It is a self-assessment tax that most home-owners are familiar with as it is generally payable on purchases of residential property by individuals where the purchase price exceeds £125,000 (although there is no nil rate band if the higher rates for additional properties apply). SDLT on residential property has become increasingly complex over recent years and HMRC’s press release highlights the need for comprehensive property and tax law advice so that buyers can be confident that they are paying the correct amount of tax.

HMRC report that their recent analysis suggests that up to a third of claims for ‘multiple dwelling relief’ (MDR) refunds were incorrect. MDR can reduce the tax liability considerably because the because the rate of SDLT is determined by the average value of the dwellings purchased, rather than their combined value. Purchasers can therefore benefit from multiple nil rate and lower percentage bandings. This relief should therefore always be considered where the features of a particular property are such that it may constitute two (or more) single dwellings, which is a question of fact in each case. HMRC do have a record of successfully challenging incorrect MDR claims in recent Tribunal cases and so it is important to analyse the details of the specific dwelling(s) carefully to assess whether the relief does apply. It is also worth noting that HMRC recently consulted on possible options to reform MDR and the taxation of mixed use properties. That consultation closed on 22 February 2022 and we await HMRC’s response to the feedback received but it seems likely that there will be further changes to SDLT in the future.

HMRC’s warning about potential cold calls also refers to other types of refund including mixed use properties, uninhabitable homes, homes purchased with access to communal gardens and the transfer of residential property to pension schemes. Any potentially relevant reliefs should always be considered at an early stage in the conveyancing process so that the purchaser is clear about how much they will need to pay at completion. This is technical area of law and, whilst we always consider HMRC’s guidance, it is important to analyse the actual law and how the relevant statutory provisions apply to the specific facts of each particular case (both by reference to the unique features of the property itself and the taxpayer’s individual circumstances). 

We are warning new homeowners not to get caught out by tax repayment agents promising easy money on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Our thinking

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Relocating to Switzerland: trusts

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • The Path to Commonhold is Set in Stone by the Government: What do landlords and developers need to know about the Government’s White Paper on Commonhold?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • "I have finished the court case and I have decided that now is not the right time for you to see your Mum" - Judges writing letters to children could become the norm

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

  • The World’s Most Exclusive Gold Card

    Kurt Rademacher

    Quick Reads

  • What do the proposed changes to business property relief mean for Investors and Entrepreneurs and their businesses?

    Mary Perham

    Insights

  • The Good, the Bad and the Ugly - the inheritance tax Consultation on agricultural and business property

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Pet Ownership and Family Breakdown: Transatlantic Treatment of Pets on Divorce

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • A Ray of Light for Developers - High Court provides some comfort in recent injunction case

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • Bank of Mum and Dad PLC

    George Harrison

    Quick Reads

  • Mike Barrington writes for Wealth Briefing on sole company directors

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

  • Miranda Fisher and Matt Foster write for eprivateclient on the consequences of cohabitation

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Stephen Burns and Katie Bewick write for Growth Business on the options available for appointing a new director after a company dispute

    Stephen Burns

    In the Press

  • Sarah Jane Boon and Julia Cox write for Tax Adviser on safeguarding family wealth and the role of pre- and post-nuptial agreements

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

Back to top