• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The UK Government closes its consultation on whether to join the Singapore Convention on Mediation

On the 1 April 2022, the Government’s consultation seeking views on whether the UK should sign and ratify the Singapore Convention on Mediation (the Convention) closed. 

The Convention is a United Nation’s treaty which seeks to establish a unified and consistent set of global rules for enforcing international commercial settlement agreements which have arisen as a result of mediation. 

The overall aim? Facilitation of trade by encouraging businesses to enter into cross-border contracts and giving the parties involved reassurance that they will be able to recognise and enforce any mediated settlement agreements across jurisdictions. 

In practice, this translates to a process whereby a party seeking to rely on a settlement agreement signed in one country can apply directly to the ‘competent authority’ (for example, the courts) of another country in order to directly enforce the agreement there, provided the desired country of enforcement is a party to the Convention and the agreement falls within its scope. Whilst there are grounds of refusal, these remain limited in nature. 

At present, without the application of the Convention, enforcement operates under the realm of contract law, thereby requiring a party to first obtain a court judgment for breach of the settlement agreement before abiding by the relevant jurisdictional rules for issuing proceedings to enforce that judgment. 

A report from the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) suggests that mediation can save businesses in the region of £4.6 billion per year due to its effectiveness in saving time, costs and commercial relationships and as such it is not surprising there are many advocates for joining the Convention. 

Those in favour argue such a move will serve to further establish the UK’s reputation as a pre-eminent forum for dispute resolution, whilst demonstrating its commitment to raising the profile of mediation internationally as an effective form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Responses from both the Law Society and the Civil Justice Council echo this support, with the latter suggesting that it is the “right time” for the UK to become a party. 

However, others suggest that whilst the intention of the Convention shows symbolic vision, the practical effects of joining may remain limited. They highlight that not only is there already a domestic method of enforcing mediated settlement agreements in the UK under contractual rules, but the nature of mediation involves an agreed settlement being reached by the parties voluntarily and as such, the need for enforcement protections remain lower.  

Despite that, currently there are 55 signatories to the Convention, including the likes of economic powerhouses such as the United States, China and India. What is more, 9 countries, including Qatar and Singapore, have gone one step further and actually ratified the Convention. 

There has arguably been a push in recent months towards increased use of ADR methods, demonstrated most notably by the 2021 Civil Justice Council report, which concluded that ADR could be made compulsory. Given these recent trends, it will be interesting to see the varying public responses to the Consultation and the subsequent decision taken by the UK Government as a result.  

Useful links:

UK Government: Consultation on the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (New York, 2018)

CEDR: The 9th Mediation Audit - A survey of commercial mediator attitudes and experience in the United Kingdom

Singapore convention on mediation – Law Society response

Civil Justice Council: Compulsory ADR - June 2021

Responding to the consultation on whether the UK should sign and ratify the Singapore Convention on Mediation 2018, the Civil Justice Council agrees it is the right time for the UK to become a Party

Our thinking

  • Arbitrating shareholders’ disputes

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New "In-House Counsel Privilege" in Swiss law

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

  • Swiss Anti-Corruption Laws: A Guide to Bribery Offences, Compliance, and Penalties

    Daniela Iselin

    Insights

  • Passage of the English Arbitration Act 2025 into Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Mary Bagnall writes for FMCG CEO on the recent Thatchers v Aldi court ruling

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • RTHK interviews Patrick Chan on the rise of sports arbitration in Hong Kong

    Patrick Chan

    In the Press

  • Stephen Burns and Katie Bewick write for Growth Business on the options available for appointing a new director after a company dispute

    Stephen Burns

    In the Press

  • 5 trends to watch in International Arbitration in 2025

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Living Together in the 2020s: Why more Gen Z’s are Saying 'Yes' to Cohabitation Agreements

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Stepping into the Director's Chair: The Landscape of Risk in Distressed Companies – Misfeasance Trading

    Jessica Boxford

    Insights

  • Justice for the Victims of Britain's Largest Ponzi Scheme?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Moths, a mansion house and multi-million pound misrepresentations

    Katy Ackroyd

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Tamasin Perkins on the concerns surrounding the proposed amendment to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Challenges for commercial property in 2025

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

Back to top