• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

LPAs – a welcome change for the better

In a statement which will be welcomed by anyone who acts for private clients, be it solicitors or their financial advisors, the Law Society has reported that the Office of the Public Guardian has confirmed that there is now no longer a requirement for the express provision in Lasting Powers of Attorney (LPAs) to be included in relation to the discretionary management of investments.  This is the long-awaited confirmation and clarity that attorneys and their advisors have been waiting for and is a welcome step in removing further expenses and bureaucracy during an already challenging time.

The revised guidance continues to shine a light on the importance of reviewing any wills, letters of wishes and LPAs (for Property and Financial Affairs, and Health and Welfare) as there may be recent legislative or personal changes that need to be considered in order to accurately reflect an individual’s wishes.

LPAs have been in the spotlight over the last couple of years. The heart-breaking ITV documentary ‘Finding Derek’ that saw presenter Kate Garraway reflect on the practical difficulties in obtaining the necessary financial access due to not having an LPA in place for her husband, Derek Draper. The Coronavirus pandemic has generated greater awareness of the importance of having LPAs in the event of unforeseen personal changes.

An LPA for Property and Financial Affairs is a valuable legal document which allows an individual, the donor, to appoint one or more attorneys to act on their behalf in relation to their financial affairs in the event of a lack of capacity (or before this with the consent of the donor). Such decisions include, but are by no means limited to, paying bills, selling property or investments and operating bank accounts. 

Following guidance issued by the Office of the Public Guardian in 2015, it was advised that provision expressly authorising the use of discretionary investment management be included in the LPA. Without this, the donor's investment manager was not permitted to continue to run a portfolio on a “discretionary” basis, often resulting in the attorney being responsible for investment decisions which they did not have the necessary expertise to make. Attorneys were therefore potentially faced with having to make an application to the Court of Protection for this permission which could be lengthy, time consuming and expensive. 

The prior guidance left LPAs drafted prior to 2015, along with any created since then by donors unaware of this requirement, without this provision.  This week's announcement is therefore a welcome change for the better, providing certainty for the donor and their attorney, as well as for the investment managers who manage funds on their behalf. It is also a timely reminder of the importance of a regular review of wills and LPAs to ensure they still meet the needs of the individual.

Law Society president I. Stephanie Boyce said: “I am delighted the OPG has decided to amend its guidance on how attorneys can invest on behalf of those for whom they’re appointed.”

“It’s in everyone’s interests to avoid the cost of an unnecessary court application.”

Our thinking

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • BBC Radio 5 Live and The Telegraph interview Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Relocating to Switzerland: trusts

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • The Path to Commonhold is Set in Stone by the Government: What do landlords and developers need to know about the Government’s White Paper on Commonhold?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • "I have finished the court case and I have decided that now is not the right time for you to see your Mum" - Judges writing letters to children could become the norm

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

  • The World’s Most Exclusive Gold Card

    Kurt Rademacher

    Quick Reads

  • What do the proposed changes to business property relief mean for Investors and Entrepreneurs and their businesses?

    Mary Perham

    Insights

  • The Good, the Bad and the Ugly - the inheritance tax Consultation on agricultural and business property

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Pet Ownership and Family Breakdown: Transatlantic Treatment of Pets on Divorce

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Bank of Mum and Dad PLC

    George Harrison

    Quick Reads

  • Mike Barrington writes for Wealth Briefing on sole company directors

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

  • Miranda Fisher and Matt Foster write for eprivateclient on the consequences of cohabitation

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Sarah Jane Boon and Julia Cox write for Tax Adviser on safeguarding family wealth and the role of pre- and post-nuptial agreements

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Living Together in the 2020s: Why more Gen Z’s are Saying 'Yes' to Cohabitation Agreements

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • SFC’s new regulatory roadmap for Hong Kong’s VA market – A-S-P-I-Re

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • Private wealth in motion: The great exodus

    Yacine Diallo

    Insights

  • ESMA Consultation on Guidelines for the criteria to assess knowledge and competence under MiCA

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

Back to top