• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Renters’ Rights Bill: The abolition of the fixed term tenancy and its impact on PBSAs

The Renters’ Rights Bill (“the Bill”) abolishes fixed term assured shorthold tenancies and prevents landlords from terminating tenancies on a “no-fault” basis. This presents a particular problem for PBSA operators who need to take back possession of their properties at the end of the academic year. 

Despite the Government’s suggestion in the explanatory notes that PBSA providers will be exempt if the provider is registered for a Government-approved code, these provisions do not yet appear in the Bill and any PBSA providers with properties which are not HMOs will find no suitable grounds of possession to rely on unless the tenant in breach of the tenancy. 

Where a relevant property is an HMO, a new ground for possession has been added to the Bill to allow a landlord to recover possession of a property let to full-time students at the end of the academic year so that it could be relet to students for the next academic year. There is an additional hurdle for the operation of this new ground which requires landlords to give tenants written notice, within one month of the commencement date of the Bill, of the landlord’s wish to be able to recover possession on the basis that the tenant meets the student test and the landlord intends to let to students. It will be important that this step is not missed given the short period within which notice will need to be given after the commencement date. 

Another issue is that with the removal of fixed term ASTs, a student tenant under the Bill is technically able to serve two months’ notice to vacate at any point during the academic year. This is a considerable potential problem due to the cyclical nature of the academic year and providers may be unable to find new students to occupy the property until the beginning of the next academic year resulting in void periods. 

Tenancies granted by a specified educational institution to students are already excluded from being ASTs and so the Bill will not affect those tenancies.

However, PBSA properties are often owned privately with developers and landowners entering into arrangements with the local planning authority, universities and other educational institutions to provide units of student accommodation and affordable student accommodation to students. Those private developers and landlords will be heavily affected by the Bill because they may currently routinely serve no-fault notices to obtain possession at the end of the academic year. The Bill does not allow landlords to obtain possession unless there is a breach of the tenancy or the tenant has caused nuisance or committed a criminal offence. This may be of concern to those providers who may wish to make this known to the Government via industry bodies.

The second reading of the Bill will take place in the House of Commons on 9 October 2024. Those in the PBSA sector will want to keep an eye on developments as the Bill progresses through Parliament as options are needed so that PBSA providers can seek possession from students at the end of each academic year under the new regime.

We are tracking developments on our Essential Residential Hub and our timeline: Evolution of the private rented sector. This insight has been prepared as a general guide only and does not constitute advice on any specific circumstances. Please seek advice on your specific circumstances.

Please do not hesitate to contact Laura Bushaway, Lauren Fraser or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact if you have any queries.

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Is grey belt the key to unlocking growth in the logistics sector?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Drapers quotes Kerry Stares on the potential for a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Extra Time: The business of women’s football in Africa

    Sarah Johnson

    Podcasts

Back to top