• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Land Manager Collaboration for Environmental Delivery

Tristram van Lawick, Partner in our Private Property team and Edward Robinson, Legal Director in our Corporate division spoke at the October Country Land and Business Association webinar to discuss the different ways land managers can work together to engage with environmental markets and the range of formal collaboration agreements to consider.

Overview of Topics Discussed:

Business Structures

  • What are the objectives?
  • Is growth or profit important?
  • How many parties will be involved?
  • Term of agreement/arrangement.
  • Seek early tax and legal advice: There will be tax consequences to any structure. What implications will the structure have on IHT planning?

Types of Business Structures:

Collaboration by Contract

  • The collaboration or structure is purely a contractual agreement which works well in the short term for a small number of parties, each with a defined mandate for they work they are going to be carrying out. This is so the contract can divide the list of duties and responsibilities and govern how the reward will be split.
  • Bank Account and an agreement: Each party decides who is responsible for each part of the agreement.
  • No continuing administrative burden: Just a contract, no regular administration is needed.
  • Limitations of legal protection: There is no separate legal identity in the structure to limit the liabilities of the parties involved.
  • Not as easily scalable - joiners and leavers: Could require cancelling previous contract and writing up a new one if there is to be any changes to the agreement that hadn’t been detailed in the original contract. Amendments can only be made with the consent of all parties.

Company Limited by Shares or Guarantee

  • This is designed for longer term organisations as it can run for an indefinite period. This structure is owned and controlled by shareholders but run by Directors. Parties that join are not necessarily required to be owners it but there are various benefits of ownership.
  • Separate Legal Entity - Legal Protection: Can contract and operate, can assume liabilities and responsibilities. Can keep a gap between the individuals that are behind that company and the company itself, so that those who are behind it are not personally liable.
  • Administrative burden - Companies House: Annual returns, confirmation statements, accounts that need to be filed etc, will require documents to be sent to companies house.
  • Companies Act 2006 - Subject to Regulation: If something happens that is significant to the life of the company, you will be required to seek legal advice. Required to involve professionals.
  • Responsibility of Directors - personal: There are circumstances where Directors may be personally liable if they fail to act in the best interests of the company. Directors should seek advice on this.
  • Raising finance - issuing shares/bank debt: As it is a separate entity, there are more options to raising finance - can issue shares.
  • Easily adaptable during growth: new parties are automatically bound to existing obligations of the structure.

Community Interest Companies (CIC)

  • It is a strict requirement to demonstrate that the primary benefit of running this company is for the community. Specifically, not the directors, shareholders or employees. If you are not within those criteria, it is not possible to become a CIC.
  • Community interest test - may be unsuitable if profit envisaged: Cannot be aiming for high profits.
  • Companies Act 2006 plus additional regulation: Obligation to produce an annual report, how the CIC is doing on delivering the community benefit, whether there is any director pay.
  • Third parties are more attracted to CICs as they are so trusted.

Cooperative/Community Benefit Societies

  • Run for the benefit of members only.
  • Restrictions on members profits/assets: restrictions on what can be done with the profits, all must go to the members and there is little opportunity to extract profit.
  • Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority rather than Companies Act 2006, which is a significant regulation.
  • Requires advice at an early stage and lots of criteria to meet.

Joint Venture

  • Parties working together towards a common objective.
  • No specific legal meaning - can cover contracts or companies.

Partnerships/LLP

  • General Partnership - formation, liability: If two companies have been doing business together for a long period of time, they could have created a partnership without realising. Each partner is individually liable.
  • Limited liability partnership:  This is a separate legal entity from its members (partners), who are only liable for money they invest, plus any personal guarantees. The partnership is incorporated at Companies House and can only be used by profit-making businesses.
  • Beware of unintentional partnerships.
  • Heavily tax driven.

Risks and Challenges

  • Finance and future funding.
  • Enforcing agreements can put a strain on relationship between parties, they need the ability to be upfront and to cover all bases.
  • Maintenance of assets - who does what? Particularly for land and property, there’s a need to know who is maintaining the assets.
  • Landlord/tenant issues.
  • Disputes: Build in a structure that states how you will deal with potential future issues.
  • Tax advice: In almost all these structures, tax will be a deciding factor.

Please watch the full webinar here.

For more information, please contact Tristram van Lawick, Edward Robinson or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The abolition of perpetuity periods: Time to sound a note of caution?

    Robert Avis

    Insights

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

Back to top