• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Matrimonial home valuations in lockdown: can they be trusted?

For many of our clients, the family home represents a significant asset in the matrimonial pot. In the event of a divorce, agreeing what should happen to the family home, be it a sale, with a possible unequal division of the proceeds, or a transfer into one party’s sole name, can hold the key to reaching a negotiated financial settlement.

The starting point is to agree the value of the property, often with the assistance of estate agents or a chartered surveyor. Where one party wishes to retain the family home, or the settlement provides for a sale of the home with an unequal division of the proceeds, the accuracy of the valuation, and whether it is agreed by both parties, is of utmost importance.

In the light of the Coronavirus pandemic, there will likely be increased scope to challenge valuations, particularly those obtained before the housing market was temporarily suspended on 23 March. This has the potential to derail or draw out financial negotiations, in what is a fast changing situation, but with little end in sight.  

There is still much uncertainty around the effect of COVID-19 on the housing market; whilst Savills predict a fall in prices of 5-10 per cent this year, there are reports of a surge in demand for properties in rural areas, particularly those that offer larger gardens. Anecdotally, we have heard of Coronavirus being used to try and renegotiate discounts of up to 20 per cent on agreed sales prices.

In this climate, it can be difficult to advise our clients on whether to rely on a property valuation in the context of a financial negotiation. Some clients may wish to put negotiations on hold to see what the future brings, particularly as Savills are expecting house prices to rise in 2021/2022. But for those of whom this is not an option, or where there is a pressing need to find a resolution, it may be necessary to adopt a more strategic approach. For such clients, my Private Property colleagues and I have put together the following tips

  1. Request an updated valuation. When entering into negotiations, an up-to-date valuation (even with caveats and projections) will be more persuasive than an outdated valuation.

  2. Consider instructing a chartered surveyor. Most surveyors should be able to provide a comprehensive report explaining how the final valuation has been reached. Given the uncertain market conditions, a detailed examination (and possible challenge) of the report by the other side is to be expected, and a surveyor will be best placed to assist with answering any questions which may arise.

  3. Test the property on the market. This is the only way to really know how your property might perform on the open market. Offers received from prospective buyers may provide a starting point for agreeing a valuation.

  4. Consider equal sharing of assets where the value is not agreed. Splitting the risk evenly may encourage resolution, as neither party will be worse off as a result of the valuation.

Where sale proceeds from the matrimonial home will be used to purchase a new property, clients may also wish to consider their ability to obtain a mortgage in the current market since some banks have changed their lending criteria, and the level of deposit they are able to offer, particularly if other investments such as stocks, shares or interest on savings are performing poorly.

Ultimately, it is still too early to predict the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the housing market. For clients who are not able to wait and see what the future holds, which is often the case in the context of a divorce, it is particularly important to take advice on how to value the matrimonial home in the current climate.

For more information please contact Rebecca Day at rebecca.day@crsblaw.com or on +44 (0)20 7438 2226.

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The abolition of perpetuity periods: Time to sound a note of caution?

    Robert Avis

    Insights

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

Back to top