• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The New CGT Rules for Separating Couples

At present, no capital gains tax (CGT) is charged on a transfer of assets between a married couple or civil partners who live together. However, if the couple separate or divorce, this tax relief does not necessarily apply.

The Office of Tax Simplification reviewed the rules relating to separating couples in 2021 and proposed a number of recommendations which the Government accepted. In a policy paper in July 2022, the government outlined their proposed revisions to the current law (contained in the Finance Bill 2022-23) and indicated that, once implemented, it would be operative from 6 April 2023, however, these provisions do not seem to have progressed through Parliament and the timing of implementation is yet to be confirmed. The intention behind the new rules is to enable a couple to separate and divorce without undue pressure to reach a financial agreement due to CGT consequences. It is expected to be of particular benefit to those involved in more complex financial proceedings, as it means more time can be spent on divorce considerations, rather than CGT considerations. 

Current Rules

Transfers of assets between former spouses or civil partners are made on a ‘no gain or no loss’ basis provided these transfers occur in the tax year in which they have separated - for example, if a couple separated in November 2022, they could only transfer assets between them free of CGT up to 5 April 2023.

This means any gains or losses from the transfer are deferred until the asset is disposed of by the receiving spouse.  The receiving spouse will be treated as having acquired the asset at the original cost paid when the transferring spouse purchased the asset.

If the transfer occurs after the tax year in which the spouses separated then it is treated as a normal disposal and will be subject to Capital Gains Tax in the normal way.

New Rules 

The proposed changes provide for a longer period of the ‘no gain, no loss’ rule for up to three years after the tax year in which spouses cease to live together.  The ‘no gain, no loss’ rule will also now apply to assets that are transferred between spouses as part of a formal divorce agreement without time restrictions. 

In addition, two further reliefs will be permitted in relation to the former matrimonial home (FMH). 

  1. A spouse who retains an interest in the FMH will be given an option to claim Private Residence Relief (PRR) when it is sold.
  2. A spouse who has transferred their interest in the FMH to the other spouse, but remains entitled to receive a percentage of the proceeds when that home is sold (known by family lawyers as a Mesher Order), will be able to apply the same tax treatment to those proceeds that applied when the interest was transferred. 

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Panglossian or Painful: Tax after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The abolition of perpetuity periods: Time to sound a note of caution?

    Robert Avis

    Insights

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

Back to top