• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Pre-sale trust planning – a timely reminder ahead of the Spring Budget?

Business-owning clients will often view a sale as a good opportunity to benefit their families and pass at least part of their realised wealth down to their children (and / or grandchildren).  When it comes to personal inheritance tax (IHT) and other tax mitigation around the sale of a business, it is important to have initial discussions early on in the process in case there is advantageous tax planning which can be undertaken pre-sale.

Business Relief (BR) and pre-sale planning

There is a particularly valuable opportunity around private trading company shares because trading businesses are usually exempt from IHT by qualifying for 100% BR.  Under current rules, “trading” means the business is wholly or mainly (i.e. over 50%) trading, rather than making and holding investments.

Assuming the shareholder has owned the shares for at least two years (and subject to certain other conditions) then they will qualify for 100% BR and the shareholder can transfer these into a trust for the benefit of their descendants or wider family without triggering an upfront IHT charge.

Conversely, in a post-sale scenario with cash sale proceeds, only a value of up to £325,000 can be transferred into a trust by each shareholder without an immediate 20% IHT charge on the excess.  This is because BR is immediately lost once there is an agreement to sell so it is crucial that any planning is considered well ahead of any exit and carried out pre-exchange on sale of the shares.  

Trusts as vehicles for succession planning

An outright gift of the shares would avoid any potential upfront IHT charge but there are a number of advantages to trusts as vehicles in succession planning:

  1. Flexibility to adapt to unknown / future circumstances (including unborn beneficiaries);
  2. Asset protection against threats to wealth such as divorce, bankruptcy or other financial vulnerability; and
  3. Efficient passing of wealth down to future generations of a family at the right time. The trustees ultimately retain control which can be useful for young or spend-thrift beneficiaries.

Any gift of shares into trust would still be subject to the usual 7 year rule meaning it would only escape IHT consequences completely if the donor survived it by 7 years. 

Furthermore, the shareholder gifting the shares needs to be wholly excluded from any benefit from the trust and there are administration costs for running a trust, which would also be subject to a separate regime of taxation. 

These are all factors which should be weighed up and considered as part of any pre-sale planning.

Post-sale options

If IHT planning considerations are left until post-exchange on the sale, the options are much more limited – for example, the making of outright gifts or establishing family investment companies (FICs). 

Even if a shareholder preferred to create a FIC post-sale, they may still consider including a trust shareholder given trusts offer certain advantages (as summarised above), particularly flexibility around unborn beneficiaries.  Such a trust can still not be funded with as much post-exchange as it could have been pre-exchange, so the same pre-sale considerations apply.

In light of these more limited options post-sale, it is clear that leaving the conversation around personal planning too late can result in a valuable opportunity to bank IHT relief being lost so it is important to take advice early when a sale is being considered, particularly with the Spring Budget around the corner and the changes which this may bring.

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Relocating to Switzerland: trusts

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Insights

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Drapers quotes Kerry Stares on the potential for a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Extra Time: The business of women’s football in Africa

    Sarah Johnson

    Podcasts

Back to top