• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The CMA shining a light on consumer issues in light of Covid-19

As we all know, the current Government restrictions mean that, since March, upcoming events and holidays have had to be cancelled or postponed for an indefinite period of time, leaving both businesses in the retail, leisure and hospitality sector and their customers in a precarious position.  There has been much public discussion and debate in relation to the challenges facing these businesses and the measures introduced to alleviate them; however, this should not detract in any way from consumer rights, which still need to be upheld to the greatest possible extent, even in these exceptional and largely unforeseen circumstances.

This has been recognised by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) which has formed a dedicated Covid-19 Taskforce to investigate and deal with the problems facing consumers as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Based on the complaints received by the Taskforce, the CMA has identified 3 sectors of particular concern:

  • weddings and private events;
  • holiday accommodation; and
  • nurseries and childcare providers.

These industries have been hit particularly hard by the lockdown measures which have meant that their businesses and the services they provide have largely ground to a halt, leaving hundreds of thousands of consumers ‘in the lurch’.  As a result, the main consumer issues identified by the CMA relate to cancellations and refunds, in particular businesses refusing to issue refunds or encouraging customers to accept vouchers instead / making it unduly difficult for consumers to access refunds.

Helpfully, the CMA has issued a statement setting out when a full refund would be expected, namely where:

  • a business has cancelled a contract without providing any of the promised goods or services;
  • no service is provided by a business, for example because this is prevented by the restrictions that apply during the current lockdown; or
  • a consumer cancels or is prevented from receiving the service, for example due to the restrictions that apply during the current lockdown.

This is not intended to be any alteration to the current consumer rights laws (largely contained in the Consumer Rights Act 2015) but rather a summary and reminder of that law. Unfortunately, the findings of the CMA appear to show that some businesses are nevertheless resisting issuing refunds to their consumers in these circumstances, potentially opening themselves up to consumer rights claims.  

Where companies are issuing refunds, the CMA has acknowledged that, in these circumstances, it might take longer than usual to process these.  However, the timeframe should nevertheless be made clear to consumers and given within a reasonable time (although no guidance is given on what might constitute a ‘reasonable’ time). 

Lastly, the CMA has stressed that businesses should not be benefiting from ‘double recovery’ by receiving money via Government schemes as well as from customers.

This CMA Taskforce and Government update shows that consumer rights are still being taken seriously during this pandemic.  In their owns words, if the CMA finds evidence that businesses are failing to comply with consumer protection law then they will “get tough – that means launching enforcement cases and moving to court action where there is a strong reason to do so”.

Our thinking

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • BBC Radio 5 Live and The Telegraph interview Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Georgina Muskett on the future implications of a high-profile court judgment relating to a £32.5m moth-infested mansion

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Claire Fallows on the government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • PBC Today quotes Mark White on Manchester United's plans to build a new football stadium worth £2 billion

    Mark White

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Drapers quotes Kerry Stares on the potential for a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

Back to top