• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Creating a trans inclusive workplace

We are starting to see cases in the Employment Tribunals related to trans rights including an appellate decision that “gender critical beliefs” are protected as a philosophical belief. The key consideration is to ensure that those with different beliefs are treated with respect while maintaining the right to freedom of expression. In the workplace, holding of a belief is not the issue, it is how a belief is manifested that is potentially contentious and if that results in discrimination, harassment, or victimisation an employer will need to act.

What are the latest transgender laws & rights?

Definition of gender reassignment

Under the Equality Act 2010 (the Act) a person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if that person is: “proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning the person’s sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex.”

Trans people are legally protected from discrimination from the moment they propose to change their sex. A person does not need to have taken any visible steps towards reassignment in to be protected, nor is any medical intervention necessary. The Act protects against discrimination, harassment or victimisation on grounds of gender reassignment. The Act does not only protect those who are gender-binary (ie who identify as male or female). In 2020, an employment tribunal held that the Equality Act protected a person who identified as gender fluid/non-binary.

As with other protected characteristics, the employer will be liable for any discrimination which occurs during employment because of gender reassignment, unless it has taken reasonable steps to prevent such conduct from taking place. The offending employee may also be personally liable. A successful claim may result in compensation including for injury to feelings as well as a declaration of the parties’ rights and/or a recommendation that the employer takes certain action to address the discrimination.

There may be instances where an individual has a related condition, for example gender dysphoria, which means they may satisfy the definition of disability under the Equality Act.

Gender Recognition Act 2004

A trans person who is at least 18 years old can apply for legal recognition of their acquired gender through the issue of a gender recognition certificate (GRC). This changes their legal gender and entitles the individual to a new birth certificate with their acquired gender. However, a GRC does not have retrospective effect and will not cover things done or events that took place before it was issued.

Under the 2004 Act, it is a strict liability criminal offence for a person who has acquired, in an official capacity, protected information regarding an individual’s gender identity, to disclose that information to any other person. This means that there is no requirement to be at fault in order to be liable.

Supporting transgender employees in the workplace

Set out below are some issues that commonly arise in the workplace. Employers may also find it helpful to look at guidance such as the Government Equality Office (GEO) publication Recruiting and retaining transgender staff: a guide for employers.

  • Absence and time off: There is specific protection provided for under the Act to ensure that someone is not treated less favourably if they are absent for reasons relating to gender reassignment, than they would if they had been absent due to sickness or injury. They are also protected against less favourable treatment if their absence is for some other reason e.g. to attend counselling. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) Code suggests that it is good practice for employers to discuss with trans staff how much time they will need off and accommodate those needs in accordance with their normal practice.
  • Dress code/uniform: A person living in their affirmed gender should be allowed to wear the uniform or abide by the dress code of the gender to which they are transitioning. Name badges or any other reference to the individual should reflect the gender to which they are transitioning.
  • Equality monitoring: If an employer uses the equality monitoring forms and includes questions relating to gender identity, they should ensure that the form is anonymous and includes the option “prefer not to say”.
  • Line management and planning for transition: Where a line manager is informed by an employee that they are transitioning or intending to transition, confidentiality will be paramount. They should have a detailed discussion about what support they might need, how they would like to be addressed, who should be told, when, any formal announcements including terminology, timescales and facilities.
  • Policies: Employers should ensure that their Equal Opportunities policy expressly covers gender identity and makes it very clear that any discriminatory or unfair treatment and/or harassment and/or bullying will not be tolerated and will be dealt with under the disciplinary procedure.
  • Pronouns: Employers should consider introducing gender neutral language in all written communications and documentation, which is more inclusive. They may also wish to consider the option for people to have their pronouns added to their email signature. However, this should not be compulsory as it may indirectly discriminate against those with gender critical views (which we now know from recent case law can potentially be protected under the Act as a philosophical belief).
  • Recruitment: A person should never be denied a job because they are trans, apart from in the very rare circumstances where an occupational requirement applies. A person should not be asked about their gender history or trans status as part of the interview or selection process. Employers should be flexible about what type of ID they ask for. Be aware of data protection considerations and that it is a criminal offence to disclose information about a person’s gender identity – see above.
  • Terminology: Employers should consider familiarising themselves with terminology. There is also a Glossary on p24 of the GEO guide referred to above.
  • Training: HR and line managers should be trained in how best to support trans employees, or employees who are transitioning or considering transitioning. Common areas of focus include dress codes/uniform, time off, terminology and toilets and changing facilities as well as handling inappropriate behaviour by other staff.
  • Toilets, washing and changing facilities: The GEO guidance states that a trans person should be free to select the facilities appropriate to the gender in which they present. It also notes that where employers already offer gender neutral toilets and changing facilities, the risk of creating a barrier for trans people is alleviated.

Note that a requirement for trans employees to use the disabled toilets carries risks as it suggests that they have some form of impairment which may amount to direct discrimination and is not advisable.

Our Expertise

We advise on all aspects of employment law including on trans rights and can support with developing recommended policies for your organisation. We use our exceptional breadth and depth of expertise to give clients personalised advice to help manage risks and resolve issues.

Please contact Syma Spanjers or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact if you would like to get in touch.

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Telegraph quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • Law 360 quotes Stewart Hey on the potential integration of the PSR into the FCA and the impact on APP fraud reimbursement

    Stewart Hey

    In the Press

  • Kevin Gibbs and Sadie Pitman write for CoStar on the need for investment in power infrastructure to support new data centres

    Kevin Gibbs

    In the Press

  • New code of practice for the cyber security of AI development

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Drapers quotes Kerry Stares on the potential for a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Extra Time: The business of women’s football in Africa

    Sarah Johnson

    Podcasts

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

Back to top