• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Points of practice – tips on FCA and LSE completion processes

For those advisers responsible for handling the FCA’s and LSE’s completion processes relating to securities issuance, there are detailed and precise administrative processes to be navigated (and tripwires for the unwary!). In this article, we set out some of the key points of practice arising from our experiences.

The first point to note is that there is a separate protocol which must be followed with each body, which we summarise below. 

FCA process

The FCA’s process is conducted primarily via its Electronic Submission System (ESS) portal, with some separate communication by email also required. Depending on the circumstances, either one or two separate cases must be opened for each matter on the ESS.

Where a prospectus is required for an issue of shares, both (1) a transaction review file and (2) an issuer management file must be opened. Where a prospectus is not required, only an issuer management file need be opened. 

Transaction review file

Where a prospectus is required, a transaction review file must be opened, and used to submit each proof of the prospectus and any supporting documents, such as competent person’s reports.

In order to reach completion, the prospectus must be submitted (i) in final clean form with marginal references, (ii) in final clean form without marginal references and (iii) as a redline against the preceding version. 

In addition, final versions of any accompanying checklists, signed by an officer of the company, must be submitted via the ESS, noting that there is no requirement, according to the FCA website, to resubmit Prospectus Regulation Rules cross-reference lists after the initial submission. 

The following ancillary items are also required in order to reach completion (which are available here), in each case submitted via the ESS unless otherwise stated: 

  • form A (an application for a prospectus to be approved by the FCA);
  • publication form (noting where the prospectus will be published);
  • no change confirmation (noting that there have been no changes to a previously submitted form A, publication form and any information incorporated by reference);
  • payment form (noting payment of the FCA’s fee);
  • sanctions letter noting that the issuer does not fall under article 5.1 or 5.2 of Council Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014;
  • eligibility letter, which in the FCA’s own words is “an opportunity to put the transaction in context and to draw to [its] attention… the key issues”; and
  • contact details confirmation form, which should be sent to PMMteam@fca.org.uk
Issuer management file

The following documents must be uploaded to the issuer management file on the ESS:

  • if a prospectus is required, a clean version of it without marginal references (i.e. the version which will be published) must be submitted;
  • notice of approval of documents (which will have been sent by email by the readers on the transaction review file once the prospectus has been approved);
  • copies of announcements relating to the placing and admission. The FCA will require a copy of the published announcement, rather than a draft announcement; and
  • a letter confirming compliance with EU sanctions (specifically that the issuer does not fall under article 5.1 or 5.2 of Council Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014).

Separately, the following must be submitted by email to the FCA at listingapplications@fca.org.uk ahead of the admission hearing:

  • confirmation that the placing agreement (if one has been used) has become unconditional in all respects;
  • that all other conditions, save admission, have been met; and
  • the home member state of the issuer for the purposes of the Transparency Directive. 

LSE process

The LSE process is conducted exclusively via email. There are two parallel email addresses used by the LSE: Admissions@lseg.com and AdmissionsInbox@lseg.com. For the avoidance of doubt, we recommend that all email correspondence with the LSE in relation to admissions of shares to trading are addressed to both of these email addresses.

An admission hearing must be booked with the LSE in order for admission of securities to take place.

The LSE requires the following documents ahead of the admission hearing:

  • completed form 1 (available from the LSE website here);
  • completion board minutes of the issuer relating to the issue of shares;
  • copy of the notice of AGM or GM (if such a meeting is being held in relation to the relevant issue);
  • confirmation that any shareholder resolutions relating to the issue have been passed; and
  • copies of announcements relating to the placing and admission. The LSE will require a copy of the published announcement, rather than a draft announcement.

The completed form 1 is required to be submitted to the LSE by no later than 48 hours prior to the date of the admission hearing.

The remaining documents may be sent at any time prior to the admission hearing, but in order to ensure that the LSE has time to process the documents and to raise any questions they have in relation to them, it is advisable to, if possible, submit the other documents at least as early as the form 1.

For more information, please contact Nathan Lightman or Mark Howard at Charles Russell Speechlys.

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Navigating the Legal Landscape of Non-Performing Loan Acquisitions in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

  • Building Safety for Higher Risk Buildings – How is the Regulatory Regime bedding in?

    Kate Knox

    Insights

  • Navigating the Digital Services Act and Online Safety Act: A Quick Guide for Digital Platform Providers on the need to police content

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Quick Reads

Back to top