• news-banner

    Expert Insights

All bets are off: ASA rules Betway YouTube video breached the CAP Code

On 8 January 2020, the Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”) found Betway Ltd (“Betway”) had breached the age restrictions contained in the CAP Code in relation to a video published on its YouTube account featuring footballer Declan Rice.

What was the video about?

The YouTube video showed West Ham’s captain, Mark Noble “pranking” his clubmate Declan Rice by arranging for his car to be clamped by an actor posing as a traffic warden. The video depicted a number of other individuals all wearing West Ham football shirts which prominently feature Betway’s logo. The tagline was “HEED YOUR HUNCH” and the video ended with the words “betway” and “bet the responsible way. 18+ begambleaware.org”.

Why was the video challenged?

The video was challenged on the basis that it prominently featured Declan Rice, aged 20, contrary to the UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing (the “CAP Code”). Under rule 16.3.14, no one who is, or seems to be under the age of 25 can play a significant role in marketing communications (save for under a limited exemption for marketing communications that include a transactional facility).

Betway argued the video simply depicted a prank, rather than an advert containing promotional content, and as such the video fell outside the scope of “a marketing communication” for the purposes of the CAP Code. Betway argued that Declan Rice was not portrayed in a sporting context, there was no reference to a specific market and there was no link to its website where a bet could be placed. For these reasons, Betway contended the material was editorial as opposed to an advertisement.

The ASA’s ruling and reasoning

The ASA disagreed with Betway’s assessment and found the video had contravened rule 16.3.14 of the CAP Code.

The ASA considered the video was promoting the Betway brand. The branded West Ham shirts featured heavily in the material, viewers would be able to place bets on the footballers featured in the video at some point in the future and the video ended with the brand’s name and the claim “bet the responsible way. 18+ begambleaware.org”. Further, the ASA considered the tagline “HEED YOUR HUNCH” encouraged viewers to consider betting. For these reasons the YouTube video was directly connected with the supply of Betway’s services and came within the scope of the CAP Code.

The ASA said that as Declan Rice featured in the video for its entire duration, he played a significant role in a marketing communication. Accordingly, as Declan Rice is under the age of 25 years old, the video contravened the CAP Code and must not appear again in its original form.

What does this mean for advertisers?

The ASA’s ruling on Betway serves as a reminder to brands using platforms such as YouTube to consider the relevant advertising regulations before posting promotional content. Advertisers should take care not to feature individuals who are under the age of 25 in a significant role in marketing communications on social media.

A link to the ASA’s full ruling can be found here.

For more information please contact Tessa Newman on +44 (0)20 7203 8843 or at Tessa.Newman@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Building and Contributing to high performing In-House Legal Teams

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Navigating the Lion City: A guide to Singapore's business etiquette and superstitions

    Shamma Ahmed

    Quick Reads

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

  • Building Safety for Higher Risk Buildings – How is the Regulatory Regime bedding in?

    Kate Knox

    Insights

  • Navigating the Digital Services Act and Online Safety Act: A Quick Guide for Digital Platform Providers on the need to police content

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Quick Reads

Back to top